2nd amendment (look at title)
thesis: compelling logically based in support of x
logos= organized, vocab, info, alot of facts
safely to homicides
(reasoned)
call to action?
ethos= not exactly credible, math major, but rep= senior
on ithacan, so cred w/ posts
use of "insider" lang: comical, knows audience
2nd amendment (serious)
strengthened further if we knew where she came from
pathos= humor at end, serious/sad, mourning in beginning of last paragraph, satire (everyone gets guns, everyone dies)
promise of gain (comfort)
fear of loss/pain
audience= readers of the ithacan so college students, faculty,
my audience=professor, generally towards agreeing w/ article
occasion (genre)= response article
my occasion=paper for class
purpose=inform dangers
ack and response= opp pov= guns are awesome to kill things w/
intro=govt should create stricter gun laws
effective. and b/c?
use of logos words
importance of text, why rh. strategies are significant
hist context=megan weintraut, jan 26th 2011 in ithacan. why produced? timely, rxn piece, response to shootings
summary=main pts, imp features, quotes, no opinions, obj overview
analysis= logos, ethos, then pathos
conclusion= analysis reveal? tell readers? why imp to readers? future w/ this text or persuasion strategy
no call to action
at least restate main pt
No comments:
Post a Comment