Reflection 3.1

I think this essay more than the other two required more of a plan.  Pre-writing was very instrumental in organizing your argument and keeping in mind that it is not a rebuttal, but a much softer and psychological case.  I feel that my use of the Rogerian "words" in the essay was almost forced, and that they did not flow easily.  I need to concentrate on having my entire essay based on acknowledgment and response.  I did like the scholarly source that I found, but I did not feel as if I used it to its full extent. Either I need to find a new excerpt from the source or find a new one all together.  All of my sources are recent, and so they help immensely with conveying my claim that there should be a revised law that incorporates evaluations for the renewal of tenure and a longer time before tenure is considered.  I think that overall the essay is effective and explains both sides of the argument well. I plan on attending the writing lab again to help with my revisions.