Reflection 2.1

This essay felt more rushed than the previous essay.  I felt that I did get off-topic and strated talking more about the topic rather than the actual analysis of the author's argument.  I felt that I had sufficient, if not more than enough, research to support my claim that the argument was not about censorship, but the educational system and the students, parents and teachers involved.  I think I went way too far over my word minimum, not that it is always bad, but I think that I might have been a little too wordy and could have explained some parts more effectively if I was more concise.  I will definitely plan on making an appointment at the writing lab again, as it helped me even further with my revision process.  Overall, I think it was a solid effort that clearly rebutted the editorial, but I felt that I could use more examples of the editorial in my rubuttal to counterargue and refute.